Abeyta Settlement Agreement

  • Uncategorized

The Water Administration Office is responsible for legally quantifying the water rights of the Taos Pueblo in New Mexico v. Abeyta water rights case by a negotiated solution. On October 7, 2016, WAO ensured the fulfillment of this responsibility by publishing a letter of formal notice in the Federal Registry that the transaction was final, binding and enforceable. “For the deal to work, we had to compromise. We had to compromise and we had to face our non-Indian neighbors,” Cordova said. Protesters initially expressed a desire to reopen the regulations to give the public more opportunities to express their views on the deal. But as the months passed, Taos Water`s custodians focused their energy on requesting a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement (HIA) that would take into account the cumulative impact of each of the colony`s components on the region`s water resources. Several other speakers – Rick Brown and Cliff Bain – have argued that the prescribed supply and reduction wells in the colony are not necessary if we learn to live in our water supply. Bain proposed that the Abeyta Adjudication be “spun into a development program,” with el Prado`s increased water supply undermining expected incremental growth. He also complained that there would apparently be only two alternatives within the EA or THE EIS – no action or full implementation of the comparison.

In the analysis, a representative of Amigos Bravos also raised the question of the number and extent of possible alternatives. Another issue that has been raised many times is, as the colony has announced, essentially “behind closed doors.” Even when the terms of the agreement were submitted to the Acequia associations or national well associations that will be responsible for maintaining the mitigation boreholes, many Parciantes did not understand the effects of this complex project or felt compelled to sign them by lawyers who claim to defend their interests. Jai Cross, a commissioner at the Atalaya acequia in Arroyo Hondo, said he felt most of the signatures were invalid due to misrepresentation. Daniel Escalante raised the same issue, as well as the possibility of paying for the maintenance and maintenance of the wells as soon as the bor funding dried up. Phaedra Greenwood, a resident of Rio Hondo, took stock of the colony`s inability to address the impact of climate change on water supply. But before turning to everyone`s complaints, Kate Patterson of Environmental Planning Services provided some project reasons and said her company, in collaboration with the BOR, would prepare a programmatic nepa document that would analyze the impact of projects identified by the colony for mutual benefit — groundwater wells, water reservoirs, and stream gauge — on the human and natural environment. The BOR does not build the projects, but provides financial assistance in the form of grants to the parties to the transaction in order to “plan, approve, design, build and build them.” .